Nationwide survey On the status of speech training for children with cochlear implants and development of a method of hearing and speech training

左向きBluebird 研究の主旨ボタン 担当研究者ボタン 協力施設ボタン 右向きBluebird
アンケート1部ボタン アンケート2部ボタン アンケート3部ボタン
区切り線

Section 2: profiles of individual children with cochlear implants-(3)

Summary of questionnaire results

Questionnaire:

Q7: Present status
Currently attending: 1. Kindergarten [3-year-old class, 4-year-old class, 5-year-old class]
2. Day care center [3-year-old class, 4-year-old class, 5-year-old class]
3. Childrenユs class in school for the deaf [3-year-old class, 4-year-old class, 5-year-old class]
4. Elementary school (grade xx)
5. Class for children with hearing disorders in elementary school (grade xx)
6. Elementary class in school for the deaf (grade xx)
7. Junior high school (grade xx)
8. Class for students with hearing disorders in junior high school (grade xx)
9. Junior class in school for the deaf (grade xx)
10. High school (grade xx)
11. Advanced class in school for the deaf (grade xx)
12. Others
Q8: Conclusion
It was advantageous to have a cochlear implantation.
1. Yes
2. No
3. Neither
For either "Yes" or "No", give details.
If a hearing aid was used before operation, compare advantages of hearing aid and implant.
1. Cochlear implantation is better than a hearing aid.
2. A hearing aid is better.
3. Neither (Reason)
Evaluate efficacy of sign communication training before operation, if given.
1. Sign language training was advantageous
2. Sign language training was not advantageous
3. Neither (Reason)